JETP Letters是一份国际同行评议期刊，用于快速出版描述从固体到基本粒子物理各个领域的基本理论和实验研究的短通信。该杂志每年有24期，欢迎所有国家的英文或俄文手稿。主题实验和理论物理的所有主题包括引力、场论、基本粒子和原子核、等离子体、非线性现象、凝聚态、超导性、超流体、激光和表面。同行评审JETP Letters是一份同行评议的期刊。我们使用单一的盲同行评审格式。我们的审稿人团队包括来自6个国家的60多名审稿人，其中80%来自国内外。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为10天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为18天。接受发表文章的最终决定由编辑委员会作出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。
letters@kapitza.ras.ru
JETP Letters is an international peer reviewed journal for rapid publication of short communications describing the basic theoretical and experimental research in all fields of physics from solid state to elementary particles. The journal has 24 issues per year and welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.TOPICS COVEREDAll topics of experimental and theoretical physics including gravitation, field theory, elementary particles and nuclei, plasma, nonlinear phenomena, condensed matter, superconductivity, superfluidity, lasers, and surfaces.PEER REVIEWJETP Letters is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 60 reviewers, both internal and external (80%), from 6 countries. The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 10 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 18 days. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.
