《当代数学分析期刊》(亚美尼亚科学院)是亚美尼亚著名的函数理论学派的研究刊物，今天，该期刊继续了该学派在一般分析领域的传统。埃里温的一群非常多产的数学家在以下领域为这本领先的数学杂志做出了贡献:实分析和复分析;近似;边值问题;积分与随机几何;微分方程;概率;积分方程;代数。同行评审《当代数学分析杂志》是一份同行评议的期刊。我们使用单一的盲同行评审格式。我们的评审团队包括来自50多个国家的50多位专家。2018年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为90天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为40天。2018年投稿退稿率为75%。接受发表文章的最终决定由同行评审人员和编辑委员会做出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。
Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Analysis (Armenian Academy of Sciences) is an outlet for research stemming from the widely acclaimed Armenian school of theory of functions, this journal today continues the traditions of that school in the area of general analysis. A very prolific group of mathematicians in Yerevan contribute to this leading mathematics journal in the following fields: real and complex analysis; approximations; boundary value problems; integral and stochastic geometry; differential equations; probability; integral equations; algebra.PEER REVIEWJournal of Contemporary Mathematical Analysis is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 50 experts from 50 countries. The average period from submission to first decision in 2018 was 90 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 40 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2018 was 75%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Peer Reviewers and the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.
