PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI SCISCIE

中文简介

《原子核物理学》(Yadernaya fizika)成立于1965年，是俄罗斯主要的关于基本粒子和原子核的期刊。主题包括核物理的实验和理论研究:核结构、光谱和性质;由光子、轻子、强子和原子核引起的辐射、裂变和核反应;基本相互作用和对称性;强子(具有光、奇异、魅力和底夸克);高能和超高能粒子碰撞;量程与统一量子场论、夸克模型、超对称性与超重力、天体物理学与宇宙学。该杂志面向研究人员、核工程师和大学。同行评审原子核物理学是一本同行评议的期刊。我们使用双盲同行评审格式。我们的审稿人团队包括80多名审稿人，包括内部审稿人和外部审稿人(95%)。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为3天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为14天。接受发表文章的最终决定由同行评审人员做出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。

投稿网址：https://www.springer.com/physics/particle+and+nuclear+physics/journal/11450

英文简介

Physics of Atomic Nuclei (Yadernaya fizika) was founded in 1965 as the leading Russian journal on elementary particles and nuclei. The topics covered are the experimental and theoretical studies of nuclear physics: nuclear structure, spectra, and properties; radiation, fission, and nuclear reactions induced by photons, leptons, hadrons, and nuclei; fundamental interactions and symmetries; hadrons (with light, strange, charm, and bottom quarks); particle collisions at high and superhigh energies; gauge and unified quantum field theories, quark models, supersymmetry and supergravity, astrophysics and cosmology. The journal is intended for researchers, nuclear engineers, and universities.PEER REVIEWPhysics of Atomic Nuclei is a peer reviewed journal. We use a double blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 80 reviewers, both internal and external (95%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 3 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 14 days. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Peer Reviewers.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.