月期刊平台服务过的文章录用时间为1-3个月，依据20年经验，经月期刊专家预审通过后的文章，投稿通过率100%以上！
《高温》是一本国际同行评议期刊，发表理论和实验研究人员的原创论文和评论。该杂志涉及低温等离子体的性质和过程;物质的热物理性质，包括纯物质、混合物及合金;临界点附近的性质，状态方程;相平衡;传热传质现象，特别是由强迫对流和自由对流引起的传热传质现象;沸腾和冷凝、辐射和复杂的传热过程;实验方法和仪器;电力工程应用高温设备等。该杂志反映了当前热物理研究的趋势。介绍了当今复杂传热过程、热过程、气体动力学过程、传热传质过程的实验和理论研究结果，以及高温介质特性理论描述的最新进展。同行评审《高温》是一本同行评议的期刊。我们使用单一的盲同行评审格式。我们的评审员团队包括内部和外部的评审员(90%)。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为5-40天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为60天。2017年投稿退稿率为33%。接受发表文章的最终决定由编辑委员会作出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。
High Temperature is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original papers and reviews written by theoretical and experimental researchers. The journal deals with properties and processes in low-temperature plasma; thermophysical properties of substances including pure materials, mixtures and alloys; the properties in the vicinity of the critical point, equations of state; phase equilibrium; heat and mass transfer phenomena, in particular, by forced and free convections; processes of boiling and condensation, radiation, and complex heat transfer; experimental methods and apparatuses; high-temperature facilities for power engineering applications, etc. The journal reflects the current trends in thermophysical research. It presents the results of present-day experimental and theoretical studies in the processes of complex heat transfer, thermal, gas dynamic processes, and processes of heat and mass transfer, as well as the latest advances in the theoretical description of the properties of high-temperature media.PEER REVIEWHigh Temperature is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes reviewers, both internal and external (90%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 5-40 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 60 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 33%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.
